Satellite images vs. drone imagery in agriculture

The use of satellite and drone imagery in agriculture revolutionizes decision-making process for agriculture businesses. The integration of geospatial intelligence, which involves analyzing and interpreting data gathered from satellite and drone imagery, is at the forefront of this transformation.

This technology provides invaluable insights into crop health, soil conditions, and overall field management, enabling precision agriculture practices that enhance productivity and sustainability. The ability to visualize and analyze agricultural landscapes from above has not only streamlined farming operations but also opened new avenues for data-driven agricultural strategies.

Check out the table of comparison of drone and satellite use in agriculture: 





Requires operator

Works autonomously


Perfect for flat and easily accessible terrains 

Disregards terrain characteristics


Usually applied to small areas

Applied to large and small aread


Forbidden in some fields

Has no restrictions on fields 

Weather dependence

Doesn’t operate in strong wind or rains

Will partially lose data due to clouds 

Cost of use

Depends on the duration of use 

Depends on the captured area size

Drone imagery in agriculture: applications, benefits and limitations

Drone imagery in agriculture is received via unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) which are equipped with cameras and sensors to capture high-resolution images of farmlands. The drones fly over fields and capture detailed photographs and data that are later processed and analyzed to get actionable agricultural insights.

Benefits of drone imagery in agriculture:

  • High-resolution data. Drones supply extremely detailed images, enabling precise monitoring of crop health and soil conditions.
  • Flexibility and precision. Farmers can deploy drones to the areas they find necessary and target specific parts of fields.
  • Time efficiency. Compared to manual methods, drones gather data from large areas much faster.

Use cases of agriculture drone imaging:

  • Drone crop monitoring. Drones provide real-time data for farmers to manage crops. They give aerial views for monitoring plant health, growth, and signs of stress or disease.
  • Yield estimation. Drones capture variations in crop density, size, and health across different field zones, and enable more accurate forecasts of harvest volumes.
  • Soil erosion monitoring. Detailed topographic maps and imagery from drones reveal erosion patterns and risk areas and allow farmers to implement preventive measures like contour plowing or cover cropping.

Limitations of drone imagery use in agriculture

  • Coverage limitation. Drones are less effective on large-scale terrains since they have a small coverage. The cost of drone flights is too high for large farmlands.
  • Weather dependency. High winds or rain can prevent drones from flying leading to delays in data collection.
  • Data analysis. Managing and interpreting drone imagery requires special software or an expert.
  • Battery life and flight time. The battery life is restricted and drones need frequent recharging or battery replacements to complete larger tasks.
drone vs satellite imagery

Satellite imagery for agriculture: application, benefits and limitations

Satellite intelligence is a convenient tool that assists farmers in their daily operations. Modern farming is hardly possible without geospatial data, and satellites excel in providing it. However, each agricultural activity requires different means, and in some cases, drones serve better than satellites. Let’s look into the applications, benefits, and constraints of satellite usage.

Benefits of satellite imagery for agriculture:

  • Accessibility and convenience. Satellites do not require physical presence at a farm to check the data. So, farmers can easily access the data remotely.
  • Wide area coverage. A satellite captures a vast agricultural area in a single pass, so they are perfect for large-scale monitoring.
  • Weather resilience. Compared to drones, satellites are more resilient to weather conditions.

Use cases of satellite imagery for agriculture:

  • Land use planning and analysis. Satellite intelligence helps with mapping and monitoring land use changes over time, and assists in crop rotation planning and sustainable land management.
  • Insurance and damage assessment. Satellite imagery can be used after storms and floods to rapidly assess damage to crops for insurance claims and disaster response planning.
  • Irrigation management. Satellites with thermal sensors detect variations in field moisture levels to help optimize irrigation schedules and conserve water.

Limitations of satellite imagery in agriculture

  • Spatial resolution limitations. Satellite imagery for agriculture often has lower resolution compared to drones. So, for small farm plots, they will be less effective.
  • Generalization issues. Some agricultural areas need specific details and satellite imagery may be too generalized for precision farming.
  • Cost of high-resolution data. Basic satellite data is accessible but high-resolution often comes at a premium cost. Its cost might be too expensive for small-sized farming businesses.

Wrapping up

Although with a set of limitations, both, drone and satellite imagery benefit farmers in multiple ways. Satellite imagery for agricultural purposes is more suitable for large areas, while drones are optimal solution for completing smaller tasks. Whether you are looking to introduce drones into your agri operations or need software to collect and analyze the data they generate, the Qaltivate team is ready to consult you. Drop us a message and we will provide you with the top experts in agri tech solutions for your project.
Lacking expertise on your project?


1. What are the advantages of using satellite images in agriculture?
Satellite imagery in agriculture enables farmers to monitor crop health, predict yields, and implement precision farming practices for efficient resource use. It also helps with large-scale land use analysis, weather impact assessment, and irrigation management, and offers insights into long-term agricultural trends.
2. How does drone imagery compare to satellite images in terms of accuracy?

Drone imagery provides higher resolution than satellite images. It allows more detailed field analysis and offers flexibility to be deployed anytime for timely assessment.

3. In what ways can satellite images be more cost-effective than drone imagery in agriculture?
Drone operations are more weather-dependent and are suitable for smaller areas. Satellite imagery is suitable and cost-effective for larger areas.
4. Are there any limitations to using satellite images in agriculture compared to drone imagery?
Satellite images in agriculture often have lower resolution than drone imagery. Satellites are limited by fixed orbits and weather dependency, and their imagery is less customizable in terms of specific field areas. Additionally, while satellite data can cover larger areas, it may be less accessible and more costly for small-scale farmers or localized agricultural needs.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *